What Is IoT Security? Internet of Things Network Security

6 min. read

IoT security is the practice of protecting internet-connected devices and the systems they rely on from unauthorized access, misuse, and disruption.

It addresses vulnerabilities introduced by limited device controls, diverse connectivity methods, and inconsistent update mechanisms.

Strong IoT security helps prevent device compromise, data exposure, and lateral movement within connected environments.

 

Why is IoT security important?

IoT security is important because internet-connected devices interact with physical systems and digital networks in ways that create new opportunities. And new vulnerabilities.

These devices often operate with minimal controls. Yet they collect, transmit, and act on sensitive data in homes, businesses, and critical infrastructure.

Without purpose-built security, IoT systems can be exploited to steal information, disrupt operations, or serve as entry points into larger networks.

  • 81% of security leaders say their organizations experienced an IoT-focused attack in the past year.
  • Organizations hit by IoT-targeted breaches were significantly more likely to face costs between $5M–$10M than those hit by traditional IT attacks.
  • 46% of organizations still struggle to gain visibility into their IoT devices, making risk management extremely difficult.

Not to mention, new use cases emerge faster than security models can adapt.

As artificial intelligence becomes more embedded in IoT ecosystems—enhancing threat detection, trust management, and device decision-making—it also introduces new attack surfaces that further raise the stakes for securing connected environments.

Plus, many devices remain deployed long after their support lifecycles end.

 

What are the primary IoT security risks and challenges?

IoT environments introduce risk in ways that traditional IT systems don't.

Many devices operate outside the reach of standard controls. They're physically exposed. They have limited compute resources. And they're often deployed without clear ownership or long-term support.

That's what makes IoT security difficult. It's not just about technology. It's about how these devices are built, deployed, and managed across environments that may not be built for oversight.

An infographic titled 'IoT security challenges' displays seven orange square icons arranged in two vertical columns against a light gray and white background. The left column contains icons and labels for four challenges: a wrench and gear icon for 'Underpowered devices', a warning symbol on a document for 'Insecure defaults', a checklist with a pen for 'Lack of standardization', and a smartwatch for 'Physical exposure'. The right column shows three more icons: an eye for 'Lack of visibility', a person with a question mark over their head for 'Unclear ownership', and a microchip with a clock face for 'Limited lifecycle support'. Each icon is accompanied by black text identifying the challenge.

Here's where the biggest challenges show up:

Many IoT devices are underpowered. They lack the processing capacity to run traditional security software or encrypt traffic reliably.

And they often ship with weak defaults, insecure firmware, or hardcoded credentials that never get changed.

There's also no standardization. Devices come from different vendors, run different software, and use different communication protocols. That makes it hard to apply consistent policies or updates across a fleet.

  • 91% of security leaders say IoT device manufacturers do a poor job securing devices from attack.
  • Manufacturers are projected to increase their use of OT assets by 400% by 2030—most of which were not designed for secure internet connectivity.

And then there's the lifecycle problem. Devices stay in use long after their support ends. Or worse, with no support policy at all. Updates are rare. Patch management is nearly impossible. So vulnerabilities linger.

Physical risk matters too. Unlike IT assets locked in data centers, many IoT devices are deployed in the open. Think parking meters, industrial sensors, or consumer gadgets. If an attacker can get to the device, they may be able to bypass software protections entirely.

Visibility is another challenge. Many IoT devices are invisible to IT teams. They don't show up in inventory. They aren't monitored. And they may not even be known to security staff. Until something goes wrong.

An infographic titled 'IoT security risks' features eight orange square icons arranged in two vertical columns on a split gray and white background. The left column displays icons and labels for four risks: a smartwatch for 'Device compromise', a stacked server icon for 'Data exposure', a document with a warning symbol for 'Unauthorized control', and a network graph for 'Lateral movement'. The right column includes four additional icons: a network of connected dots for 'DDoS participation', a circuit board for 'Physical access & tampering', a heart monitor waveform for 'Lack of visibility & monitoring', and a microchip for 'Software & firmware supply chain exposure'. Each icon is paired with a descriptive label in black text.

What happens when these gaps are exploited?

  • Devices get compromised and used as entry points into larger systems.

  • Sensitive data is exposed through unencrypted traffic or weak authentication.

  • Attackers issue commands or take unauthorized control.
  • Lateral movement enables deeper access across networks.
  • Devices are hijacked into botnets and used in large-scale DDoS attacks.
  • Supply chain issues introduce hidden vulnerabilities through third-party firmware or components.

Ultimately, securing IoT means addressing both the limitations of the devices and the realities of how they're deployed.

 

Which IoT devices and industries are most vulnerable?

The diagram illustrates example attack pathways in high-risk IoT environments. At the top, a cloud and internet layer connects to an admin server and a victim server. Arrows show potential attack flows including a 'MITM attack' and a 'DDoS attack'. The middle layer labeled 'Fog' contains IoT gateways, one of which is marked 'IoT gateway affected by Mirai Botnet'. The bottom layer depicts three environments: a smart home with icons for a thermostat, lock, camera, speaker, and appliances; a cellular network with icons for a smartphone, tablet, laptop, and other connected devices; and a healthcare network with icons for CT scan, ultrasound, and MRI machines. Red arrows trace malicious pathways from compromised IoT gateways up through the fog layer into the admin and victim servers.

Not all IoT environments carry the same level of risk.

Some devices are inherently more vulnerable—because of how they're built, where they're deployed, or whether they can be updated and monitored.

And some industries rely more heavily on these devices in critical or distributed systems. Basically, the riskiest devices often show up in the riskiest places.

Here's a breakdown of high-risk device types and where they tend to appear.

High-risk IoT devices and where they're commonly deployed
Device type Example use Why it's vulnerable Common in
Consumer electronics Smart TVs, voice assistants, doorbells Weak defaults and rare security updates Homes, retail environments
Home networking gear Wi-Fi routers, range extenders Often misconfigured or unmanaged by end users Residential, small business
Security systems Networked cameras, smart locks Exposed to the internet and often lack strong authentication Government, commercial, infrastructure
Healthcare devices Monitors, wearables, infusion pumps Handle sensitive data with limited ability to patch or monitor remotely Hospitals, elder care, telehealth
Industrial control Sensors, PLCs, automation units Long lifespans and limited tamper protections Manufacturing, utilities, energy
Connected vehicles GPS trackers, infotainment systems High mobility, long update cycles, and external network exposure Transportation, logistics, consumer
Public infrastructure Utility meters, traffic systems, surveillance Distributed, physically accessible, and often lack IT-level asset management Cities, municipalities, critical infrastructure
Retail / public kiosks Smart vending machines, self-checkouts Run on outdated platforms and are physically exposed Retail, transit, quick-service locations

 

How does IoT security work?

The diagram illustrates example attack pathways in high-risk IoT environments. At the top, a cloud and internet layer connects to an admin server and a victim server. Arrows show potential attack flows including a 'MITM attack' and a 'DDoS attack'. The middle layer labeled 'Fog' contains IoT gateways, one of which is marked 'IoT gateway affected by Mirai Botnet'. The bottom layer depicts three environments: a smart home with icons for a thermostat, lock, camera, speaker, and appliances; a cellular network with icons for a smartphone, tablet, laptop, and other connected devices; and a healthcare network with icons for CT scan, ultrasound, and MRI machines. Red arrows trace malicious pathways from compromised IoT gateways up through the fog layer into the admin and victim servers.

IoT security works by layering protections across the entire device lifecycle.

It starts with provisioning: assigning identities, applying secure configurations, and controlling initial access.

From there, protections like encryption, authenticated updates, and behavior monitoring help maintain trust. Devices enforce local policies, log key events, and report on their own posture when possible.

And if something goes wrong, recovery mechanisms help restore the device or safely remove it.

Because many IoT systems can't rely on constant updates or central control, strong security depends on designing devices and environments that can defend, detect, and recover on their own.

 

What are the essential elements of IoT security?

The diagram titled 'Essential elements of IoT security' displays a circular hub-and-spoke layout. In the center, a large white circle contains the title text. Surrounding this center are 14 evenly spaced blue circular icons, each labeled with a specific security element and connected to the center by thin gray lines. Starting from the top and moving clockwise, the elements are: 'Policy enforcement,' 'Software & firmware updates,' 'Trustworthiness & attestation,' 'Device recovery,' 'Device identification,' 'Secure configuration,' 'Logical access control,' 'Event logging & monitoring,' 'Data protection,' 'Device provisioning & deprovisioning,' 'Physical security,' 'Cyber resilience,' 'Secure communications,' and back to 'Policy enforcement.' Each icon is paired with a distinct line-art symbol visually representing the concept. The layout is symmetrical and emphasizes the interconnectedness of all elements in a full-stack IoT security approach.

There's no single control that makes an IoT device secure.

Security depends on a combination of protections. Each focused on a different aspect of the device's lifecycle, functionality, and environment.

You need a full stack of coordinated elements that work together to defend against compromise, maintain operational integrity, and support secure management.

  • Device identification: Each device should have unique logical and physical identifiers to support asset tracking, access control, and monitoring.
  • Secure configuration: Devices must support authorized configuration changes and reject unauthorized ones. Secure defaults and restore points are important.
  • Data protection: Confidentiality and integrity must be maintained for data at rest and in transit. Encryption and secure key management are essential.
  • Logical access control: Only authorized users, services, or systems should be able to interact with the device. Role- or attribute-based policies help limit misuse.
  • Software and firmware updates: Devices should accept only authenticated, integrity-checked updates. Signed firmware and code verification are critical.
  • Event logging and monitoring: Security events like access attempts, config changes, and anomalies should be logged to support detection, investigation, and compliance.
  • Device recovery: Compromised or malfunctioning devices should support restoration to a known-good state or allow for secure data wiping.
  • Device provisioning and deprovisioning: Devices should support secure onboarding with identity validation and configuration enforcement. Deprovisioning should revoke access and erase data.
  • Physical security: Devices in exposed locations should include tamper resistance and protections against key or firmware extraction.
  • Cyber resilience: Devices should maintain safe operations under attack, including denial-of-service resistance and degraded-mode functionality.
  • Secure communications: All network communications should be encrypted and authenticated. Devices must avoid transmitting sensitive data over insecure channels.
  • Trustworthiness and attestation: Devices should be able to report on their own security posture, software state, and configuration integrity to support trust decisions.
  • Policy enforcement: Devices should enforce local rules such as access limits, rate controls, or usage restrictions based on their role and conditions.

 

What frameworks, standards, and regulations guide IoT security?

Several frameworks and standards help guide how organizations approach IoT security.

Some apply broadly across devices and industries. Others are tailored to specific contexts—like consumer products or industrial systems.

Here's a quick overview of the most relevant ones:

IoT security frameworks, standards, and regulations
Name Type Description Applies to
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) Framework Provides voluntary, high-level guidance for managing cybersecurity risk. Often used as a foundation for other IoT-specific efforts. All sectors
NIST SP 800-53 Standard Offers detailed security and privacy controls used by federal systems, adaptable to IoT environments. Federal and critical infrastructure
NIST SP 800-82 Standard Focuses on securing industrial control systems, including IoT components used in OT networks. Industrial / OT
NIST IR 8259 & 8259A Baseline guidance Defines the core baseline of capabilities IoT devices should support for cybersecurity readiness. IoT device makers
NIST IR 8228 Risk guidance Offers recommendations for identifying and mitigating IoT-specific risks, including device lifecycle concerns. General IoT use
ETSI EN 303 645 Standard Sets baseline security requirements for consumer IoT devices. Emphasizes outcome-focused controls like password policies and secure updates. Consumer IoT
IoTSF Compliance Framework Framework Developed by the IoT Security Foundation to support secure-by-design practices across the device lifecycle. Commercial and industrial
Industrial Internet Security Framework (IISF) Framework Developed by the IIC, focused on securing the Industrial Internet of Things. Emphasizes trustworthiness and secure data flow. IIoT / industrial
PSA Certified Certification Hardware-based certification scheme backed by Arm and industry partners, aligned to threat models and best practices. Embedded IoT
IoT Security & Privacy Trust Framework (OTA) Framework Outlines principles and recommendations for trustworthy consumer IoT products. Focuses on privacy, updates, and disclosures. Consumer-focused

Learn how to unify OT and IT security without compromising productivity, featuring A CISO's Guide to Navigating OT & IT Convergence in the Manufacturing Industry.

Download eBook

 

IoT Security Faqs

IoT security is the practice of protecting internet-connected devices and their systems from unauthorized access, misuse, or disruption.
You can think of IoT security as falling into three broad categories:
  1. Device security – focuses on protecting the device itself (firmware, access control, physical hardening).
  2. Network security – ensures secure communication and prevents unauthorized access or data interception.
  3. Operational security – covers monitoring, updates, lifecycle management, and response to threats across the IoT ecosystem.
While there’s no universal model, a practical way to view IoT security is in four progressive levels:
  1. Visibility – knowing what devices are on your network.
  2. Control – enforcing configuration, access, and communication policies.
  3. Protection – applying encryption, authentication, and segmentation.
  4. Resilience – ensuring systems can detect, respond, and recover from compromise.
IoT devices introduce new risks due to their connectivity, limited protections, and interaction with physical systems. Security is essential to prevent data loss, operational disruption, and lateral attacks.
The main concern is that IoT devices are often poorly secured yet deeply embedded in critical systems, making them easy targets for attackers and hard to manage securely.
Device compromise is one of the biggest concerns. It can lead to unauthorized access, data theft, lateral movement, or control of critical systems.
Common methods include device identification, secure configuration, encrypted communications, access control, signed updates, monitoring, and segmentation.