- What Is the Difference Between IoT and OT Security?
-
What Is 5G Security? A Primer on 5G Network Security
- What is the difference between 4G and 5G security?
- What makes 5G networks harder to secure?
- What exactly needs protecting in a 5G network?
- What are the biggest 5G security risks?
- What security features are built into 5G?
- Who's responsible for keeping 5G secure?
- Which environments demand the strongest 5G security?
- What's next for 5G security?
- 5G security FAQs
-
What Is ICS Security? | Industrial Control Systems Security
- What is an ICS?
- Why is ICS security important?
- How does ICS security work?
- What is the role of IT/OT convergence in ICS security?
- What kinds of cyberthreats commonly impact ICSs?
- What are the main ICS security challenges?
- What are the primary ICS protocols?
- How to achieve ICS security step-by-step
- 10 ICS security best practices
- What are the primary ICS security frameworks, standards, and regulations?
- What is ICS supply chain security?
- 2025 ICS security market and trends
- What are the different types of industrial control systems?
- What are the components of an industrial control system?
- What are the differences between OT, ICS, SCADA, and DCS?
- How does ICS security compare with OT and SCADA security?
- What is the history of industrial control systems?
- ICS security FAQs
-
What is IoT Security?
-
What Is the Purdue Model for ICS Security? | A Guide to PERA
- How does the Purdue Model for ICS Security work?
- What are the Purdue Model layers?
- What are industrial control systems?
- What are the main ICS architecture security challenges?
- What kinds of cyberthreats commonly impact ICS?
- What is the history of the Purdue Model?
- Examining the Purdue Model’s role in modern ICS security
- Purdue Model for ICS Security FAQs
- What is OT security?
-
What Is IT/OT Convergence?
- What Is OT?
- What Is the Difference Between IT and OT?
- How and Why IT and OT Are Converging
- Types of IT/OT Convergence
- The Role of IoT and IIoT in IT/OT Convergence
- IT/OT Security Convergence
- Impacts of IT/OT Convergence on ICS Security
- IT/OT Convergence Benefits
- IT/OT Convergence Challenges
- IT/OT Convergence Use Cases and Examples
- IT/OT Convergence Best Practices
- IT/OT Convergence FAQs
- What Is Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Security?
-
What Is Cyber-Physical Systems Security (CPSSEC)? | Overview
- What are examples of cyber-physical systems?
- What is the difference between a cyber-physical system and an Internet of Things (IoT) device?
- Why is cyber-physical system security important?
- What are the common cyber-physical system security challenges?
- What to look for in a CPS protection platform
- Cyber-physical systems security FAQs
- What Is Critical Infrastructure? Why Does Critical Infrastructure Security Matter?
- IT vs. OT Security | What Are the Differences?
- What Are the Differences Between OT, ICS, & SCADA Security?
- What Is the Difference Between IT and OT? | IT vs. OT
-
How to Secure IoT Devices in the Enterprise
-
The Impact of IT-OT Convergence on ICS Security
-
Building Secure Smart Cities in the Age of 5G and IoT
What Is Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) Security?
IIoT security is the protection of industrial systems that use internet-connected devices to monitor, control, or automate physical processes.
It focuses on preventing unauthorized access, tampering, or disruption across the network of sensors, controllers, and infrastructure used in industrial environments. Because these systems interact with real-world operations, security failures can cause physical, operational, and financial harm.
What is the industrial internet of things (IIoT)?

The industrial internet of things (IIoT) is a system of connected devices designed to monitor, control, and optimize industrial operations.
These devices collect data from physical environments and communicate with centralized systems or other machines.

IIoT is widely applied in sectors like manufacturing, energy, and transportation to improve efficiency and automation.
Why is IIoT security important?
Industrial operations increasingly rely on connected devices to automate and optimize physical processes. That includes systems used in manufacturing lines, power grids, water treatment plants, and transportation infrastructure.
When those devices are insecure, the consequences extend beyond digital assets. They can disrupt production, damage equipment, or even compromise safety.
- 81% of security leaders say their organizations experienced an IoT-focused attack in the past year.
- Organizations hit by IoT-targeted breaches were significantly more likely to face costs between $5M–$10M than those hit by traditional IT attacks.
- 46% of organizations still struggle to gain visibility into their IoT devices, making risk management extremely difficult.
- 91% of security leaders say IoT device manufacturers do a poor job securing devices from attack.
- Manufacturers are projected to increase their use of OT assets by 400% by 2030—most of which were not designed for secure internet connectivity.
More specifically, IIoT systems introduce potential attack surfaces at every layer—from low-level device vulnerabilities to application-layer exploits. Each layer must be secured to prevent cascading risk.
As demonstrated here:

Here's why that matters–
Unlike general IT systems, IIoT environments control real-world operations. A breach can trigger downtime that halts production or disables critical infrastructure. In sectors like energy or public transit, those disruptions can affect entire communities.
IIoT deployments also introduce new dependencies.
Devices often connect through wireless protocols, cloud platforms, and third-party tools—each with its own attack surface. If not properly secured, those components create entry points that didn't exist in traditional industrial systems.
And industries can't fall back on legacy protections.
Many IIoT systems operate alongside or on top of aging control technologies that weren't designed with cybersecurity in mind. That creates complexity and increases exposure.
In short:
IIoT security is essential because the systems it protects have a direct impact on operations, uptime, and safety. As industrial environments modernize, the need for purpose-built security grows more urgent.
How is IIoT security different from IoT security?
The difference between IIoT and IoT comes down to environment and impact:
IoT usually refers to consumer or enterprise devices—like smart thermostats or connected printers—designed to improve convenience or efficiency.
IIoT applies those same connectivity principles to industrial operations. But the stakes are much higher because IIoT systems directly affect physical equipment and real-world processes. So security failures carry a greater risk of disruption, damage, or even harm.
Why does that matter for security?
IIoT environments often include older systems, proprietary protocols, and minimal device protections. Many components were never designed to connect to the internet.
Once online, they become targets for attack. And unlike a smart fridge, a compromised industrial sensor can have safety or operational consequences.
Security controls also differ.
IIoT networks require specialized protections that account for uptime requirements, long device lifecycles, and legacy hardware. Even basic steps like patching or authentication can be harder to implement without disrupting operations.
IoT security typically focuses on data confidentiality and network hygiene. But IIoT security must also prioritize availability, system integrity, and physical safety. That shift in focus changes how threats are modeled and how controls are applied.
In short:
IIoT security isn't just about securing connected devices. It's about adapting cybersecurity principles to environments where uptime and safety come first.
What are the primary IIoT security risks?

Industrial systems bring unique security challenges.
That's because they weren't originally designed for internet connectivity.
Once connected, they inherit the same risks as traditional IT systems—but with higher consequences. Downtime, disruption, and safety hazards can all result from a single compromise.
In other words:
These risks aren't just about data. They're about physical processes and real-world outcomes.
Device-level vulnerabilities
Many IIoT devices are built for durability and long lifespans, not security. They often lack basic protections like secure boot, encrypted storage, or patch management. If one device is compromised, it can become a weak entry point to the rest of the network.
Unsecured communications
IIoT environments rely heavily on machine-to-machine communication. When these connections aren't encrypted or authenticated, attackers can intercept or alter sensitive data in transit. This opens the door to command injection, spoofing, and data tampering.
Legacy systems and protocols
Industrial networks often include decades-old systems and proprietary protocols. These weren't built with security in mind. Many lack basic safeguards, and updating them may be difficult—or even impossible—without disrupting operations.
Lack of segmentation
Flat networks make it easier for attackers to move laterally once they've gained access. In industrial settings, this could allow them to jump from a low-value sensor to a safety-critical controller. Without segmentation, even minor breaches can escalate quickly.
Weak or absent authentication
Some IIoT systems default to shared credentials or offer no user authentication at all. This creates opportunities for unauthorized access, especially in remote or distributed environments. Strong, role-based authentication is often missing.
What are the main standards and frameworks for IIoT security?
Industrial environments present distinct cybersecurity challenges. And no single framework covers every IIoT security requirement.
Instead, several standards offer guidance based on the organization's industry, architecture, and risk profile.
These frameworks are not always mandatory. But they help structure security controls across devices, networks, data flows, and operational processes.
In other words:
They give industrial organizations a way to align security efforts with established practices for operational technology (OT) and cyber-physical systems (CPS).
Here's a breakdown of the most widely referenced IIoT security standards and frameworks:
IIoT security standards and frameworks | |
---|---|
Framework | Description |
NIST SP 800-82 Rev. 3 | Provides detailed guidance on securing ICS environments, including IIoT components. Covers architecture, threats, and countermeasures for different system types. Developed by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. |
ISA/IEC 62443 | A widely adopted international standard for industrial automation and control system security. Addresses technical, operational, and organizational controls across multiple stakeholder roles and system lifecycles. |
ENISA Guidelines: Guidelines for Securing the Internet of Things and ENISA Guidelines on Cybersecurity for OT and ICS | Issued by the EU Agency for Cybersecurity, these include general IoT and OT-specific recommendations. While not exclusive to IIoT, they offer useful guidance on secure design, risk assessment, and resilience across connected and industrial systems. |
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) | A broad, risk-based framework for critical infrastructure protection. Often used in tandem with more specific IIoT or ICS guidance. Helps map out security priorities and assess maturity. |
ISO/IEC 27001 with ISO/IEC 27019 | While ISO/IEC 27001 is a general information security management standard, ISO/IEC 27019 extends it to cover control systems in energy and utility sectors. Together they offer a structured approach to security governance. |
Industrial Internet Consortium (IIC) IIRA & SFSA | The Industrial Internet Reference Architecture and Security Framework provide architectural models and layered security recommendations for IIoT systems. Useful for designing secure-by-design IIoT implementations. |
What does a strong IIoT security foundation look like?
A strong IIoT security foundation isn't just about firewalls and patches. It's about aligning technology, people, and processes to secure highly distributed, always-on industrial systems.
That means building in protections from the ground up—starting at the device layer and working up through the network, applications, and overall governance.
In other words:
It's not a single control or fix. It's a systemwide approach to managing risk over time.
Here are the core elements:
Visibility and asset inventory
You can't protect what you don't know about. That's why IIoT security starts with complete visibility. Organizations need an accurate, up-to-date inventory of all IIoT devices and systems—including operational technology (OT), sensors, controllers, and legacy equipment.
Network segmentation and zoning
Flat networks are common in industrial settings. But they make it easier for attackers to move laterally. Segmenting IIoT networks into trusted zones—especially isolating critical systems—limits exposure and helps contain incidents.
Secure device lifecycle management
IIoT devices often lack built-in protections. That makes it critical to harden devices before deployment and maintain them over time. This includes secure onboarding, configuration, patching, and end-of-life handling.
Strong authentication and access control
Shared credentials and default passwords are still widespread in IIoT. Role-based access, multifactor authentication, and centralized identity management are key to preventing unauthorized access—especially across remote or distributed assets.
Encrypted, authenticated communications
Unprotected machine-to-machine traffic is one of the most overlooked risks. Secure protocols and mutual authentication help prevent command injection, spoofing, and data tampering.
Ongoing monitoring and incident response
Industrial networks need real-time monitoring to detect anomalies early. And they need an incident response plan that accounts for both IT and OT systems. Downtime and safety risks mean quick containment is critical.
Governance and cross-functional collaboration
IIoT security isn't just a technical challenge. It requires coordination between IT, OT, engineering, compliance, and executive leadership. Shared policies, risk models, and escalation procedures help ensure consistent security across teams and sites.
How should IIoT security align with IT and OT programs?
IIoT security doesn't operate in a vacuum. It spans both information technology (IT) and operational technology (OT) environments.
Which means: It needs to work across both. And be coordinated from both sides.
IT, OT, and IIoT systems comparison: connectivity and security requirements | |||
---|---|---|---|
IT | OT | IIoT | |
Connectivity mechanisms | Via Telco, Wi-Fi | Via Telco, Radio, Satellite, Powerline Carrier, Wi-Fi | Via Ethernet, Wi-Fi, cellular, LPWAN, 5G |
Security priority | Data security with high confidentiality | Operational uptime with high availability, safety, and integrity | Data integrity and system availability; secure remote access; safety-critical M2M communication |
Security standards | ISO-17799, 27001, NIST SP 800-53 | ISA99, NERC CIP 002-009, NIST SP 800-53, NIST SP 800-82 | ISA/IEC 62443, NIST SP 800-82, IIRA/SFSA, ISO/IEC 27019, ENISA Guidelines |
Security patching | Frequent | Slow to impossible | Delayed and inconsistent; often dependent on vendor support and operational maintenance windows |
Cyber forensics | Available | Limited, if any | Emerging but limited; depends on integration with centralized monitoring and visibility tools |
Overall impact from security breaches | Business impacts | Business impacts, process fluctuations, equipment damage, environmental release, personnel safety | All of the above, plus risk of real-time disruption to remote operations, supply chains, or infrastructure |
Here's why:
IIoT systems are deeply embedded in OT environments. But they introduce risks that are more common in IT—like remote access, software vulnerabilities, and internet exposure.
If IT and OT teams work separately, they'll miss critical gaps. Or worse, apply controls that don't fit the context.
For example: IT might push frequent patching. But that may not be feasible on OT equipment that runs 24/7. On the other hand, OT might prioritize uptime above all. But that can't come at the cost of basic security hygiene.
So what's the fix?
Cross-functional coordination. Shared priorities. A clear chain of responsibility.
IIoT security should be part of a broader IT/OT security strategy that accounts for both digital risk and operational resilience. That includes aligned incident response plans, shared asset visibility, and security controls tailored to each environment.
Important:
This isn't about merging the two teams. It's about making sure they communicate, plan, and act together.
That way, IIoT doesn't become the weak link between two disconnected programs. It becomes a bridge between them.